Modification and Performance Evaluation of a Low Cost Electro-Mechanically Operated Creep Testing Machine

 

John J. MOMOH*, Lanre Y. SHUAIB-BABATA and Gabriel O. ADELEGAN

 

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Federal Polytechnic, Ado-Ekiti

*E-mail: jjmomoh@gmail.com

 (* Corresponding author)

 

 

Abstract

Existing mechanically operated tensile and creep testing machine was modified to a low cost, electro-mechanically operated creep testing machine capable of determining the creep properties of aluminum, lead and thermoplastic materials as a function of applied stress, time and temperature. The modification of the testing machine was necessitated by having an electro-mechanically operated creep testing machine as a demonstration model ideal for use and laboratory demonstrations, which will provide an economical means of performing standard creep experiments. The experimental result is a more comprehensive understanding of the laboratory experience, as the technology behind the creep testing machine, the test methodology and the response of materials loaded during experiment are explored. The machine provides a low cost solution for Mechanics of Materials laboratories interested in creep testing experiment  and demonstration but not capable of funding the acquisition of commercially available creep testing machines. Creep curves of strain versus time on a thermoplastic material were plotted at a stress level of 1.95MPa, 3.25MPa and 4.55MPa and temperature of 20oC, 40oC and 60oC respectively. The machine is satisfactory since it is always ready for operation at any given time.

Keywords

Creep; Time; Temperature; Thermoplastic; Testing; Material.

 

 

Introduction

 

Success in today’s market place requires improvements in efficiency, quality and accuracy of testing facilities and testing equipment. Testing is an essential part of any engineering activity, it is necessary at any point in the engineering process [1]. Iron, steel, aluminum, copper, lead and zinc and their alloys are metals that are mostly used for the production of appliances, devices, machines and buildings. Recent developments associated with the innovative use of thermoplastics in structural applications demand accurate engineering data. More specifically, the assessment of structural performance requires data that spans appropriate ranges of stress, time, temperature, and strain rate [2]. The spectrum of their properties determines the essential demands on testing machines. Creep testing machines are predominantly used to measure how a given material will perform under constant load, at elevated temperature. The primary use of the creep testing machine is to enable students generate values for creep-time curve. Once the curve is generated, a graph book, pencil and straight edge or computer algorithm can be used to calculate the steady state creep rate for each combination of load and temperature, plot the creep rupture data as the logarithm of stress versus the logarithm of rupture lifetime at constant temperature called stress-rupture-curve.

Creep is define as a time-dependent deformation that happens when metals or other materials are subjected to constant load at high temperature over a period of time [3]. The temperature at which material starts to creep depends on its melting point. Creep at room temperature is more common in polymeric materials and is called cold flow or deformation under load [4]. Soft metals (e.g. lead) creep at room temperature. Thus Andrade commenced studies of creep behaviour in 1910 using lead, since this metal exhibits creep at room temperature [5]. It has been found that plastic deformation at both room and elevated temperatures prior to creep testing has either beneficial or detrimental effect on the materials. As observed by Xia and Ellyin [6], a problem on plastic deformation has been previously studied experimentally for several materials.

Many mechanical systems and components like steam boilers and reactors, steam generators or turbine rotors must operate at high temperature under significant stress. For this reason, the components and structures need to be designed on the basis that excessive creep distortion must not occur within the expected operating life of the plant [8]. Knowledge of the creep behaviour of metals or any material is therefore important.

The importance of mechanical testing of material to students and engineering practitioners cannot be underrated. Most institutions and research institutes in Nigeria face the problem as regards material testing such as, unavailability, ageing, financial constraint in procurement of new machine, etc.

Unavailability of material testing machines such as creep testing machine is the order of the day in most Nigerian schools and research centers. The major source of obtaining these machines is from the foreign based companies. This makes the testing machines to be unavailable. In some cases where they are found, they are either obsolete or non-functioning. Thus the students and professionals rarely get access to testing machine for experimental use.

The present work will proffer solutions to all the factors hindering the accessibility of students and professionals to creep testing machine, since the machine is locally made, ease to procure, maintain, use and affordable due to low cost of production.

 

 

Material and Method

 

The creep testing machine shown in Fig. 1 consists of important features, which must exist in any creep testing machine. These features are:

§         Load Application System

This comprises a load hanger, dead weight and load beam with a mechanical advantage of 8:1. The load beam gives a steady and uniform tensile load. It is a mechanism for applying a load to the test-piece and for carrying the load at a controlled rate.

§         Grips and Fixtures

This is used for locating and holding the test-piece in a satisfactory position. Correct alignment of the grips and the specimen when clamped in the grips is important; offsets in alignment will create bending stresses and lower creep readings. It may even cause the specimen to fracture outside the gage length [8]. The load applied from the hanger through the load beam is transmitted to the material through the upper test piece. The test piece grip is made out of a long steel shaft with a gripping device for threaded-end specimens attached to the top and bottom heads of the machine.

 

Figure 1. Creep testing machine

 

 

§         Strain measuring system

The main mechanism for accurate measurement and recording of change in specimen dimensions is a dial gauge. When a force is applied to the specimen, strain occurs and relative movement between the gripping points is transmitted through the load beam to the dial gauge. The dial gauge is calibrated in steps equivalent to an extension of 0.001mm and the maximum amount of extension measured is 2.5mm.

§         Heating chamber

It is an enclosure to generate and maintain the temperature around the specimen during test. The heating chamber consists of rolled steel iron, refractory and heating element. The refractory is composed of saw-dust, kaolin, ball clay, sodium silicate and silica sand.

§         Test specimen

The standard dealing with the design of test specimen as established by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) shown in Fig. 2 and Table 1 was in the development of mass production of the specimen using the ETF mini Computer Numerical Control (CNC) turning machine.

 

Table 1. Standard threaded-end specimen dimensions, mm (ASTM, 2004).

G -

D -

R -

A -

L -

B -

C -

Gage length

Diameter

Radius of fillet

Length of reduced section

Overall length

Length of end section

Diameter of end section

62.5 ± 0.1

12.5 ± 0.2

10

0.75

145

35

20

 

Figure 2. Threaded-end specimen

 

§         Design of frame

For 6” × 2” U-channel

Area= A m2,      Height of frame = L m

Volume = V = A × L = 4.517 × 10-3m3

Density of steel = ρ kg/m3

Weight (mass, m) = ρ × V = 35.69kg

1 frame, m= 35.69kg

2 frames, m = 2 × 35.69 = 71.37kg

§         Supporting channels (4 off)

For 5” × 1.75” channels

Volume = V = 0.001298m3

Weight of 1 supporting frame = 10.23kg

4 frames = 40.93kg

L angles bar (unequal legs) 31/2 × 3

Weight of 2 angle bars = 19.43kg

Top plate weight = 22.28kg

Bottom plate weight = 8.295kg

§         Heating chamber

Weight of rolled steel iron + refractory = 74.6kg

Total weight of the frame = Weight of 2 standing channels  + weight of 4 supporting channels + weight of 2 angle bars + weight of top and bottom plates + weight of heating chamber = 236.91kg

Since weight of the frame with other accessories is 236.91kg, the applied load should not exceed 23,240.9N

§         Maximum load applied to hanger

From Fig. 3, the weight (W) creates the tensile force (F) through the simple lever with  = 2905.1N taking moment about the fulcrum. The maximum allowable load for the hanger is 2905.1N; any load applied beyond this value will topple the machine.

The American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) has established a number of standards covering practically every aspect of testing. There are separate standards dealing with the design of the specimens, certifying the testing machine, performing the test, analyzing the results and even comparing the results of tests where different specimen designs were used. These standards are invaluable. They help to ensure that results from many different laboratories are consistent and reliable [9].

§         Test procedure for the testing machine

(i)            Remove any load from the hanger

(ii)          Measure and write down the specimen cross sectional area A

(iii)         Mark out the gauge length (Lo)

(iv)        Carefully place the specimen between the lower and upper grips in the furnace

(v)          Zero the dial gauge, the lever is locked in place by a locking pin

(vi)        The heating element is switched on to heat the chamber to desired temperature

(vii)       Apply load gradually and adjust dial gauge to zero.

(viii)     At the desired temperature, locking pin is removed and a stop watch is started at the same moment.

(ix)        Recordings are taken of extension and time

(x)          Recorded values are plotted to produce an extension time graph.

Figure 3. Creep testing machine sectional front elevation.

 

 

Results

 

In order to benchmark the new creep testing machine, several standard measurements and calibrations were made. Creep tests were carried out on Polytetrafluoroethylene (Teflon) for 12.5mm diameter, 62.5mm gage length with creep curve generated as shown in Figures 4, 5 and 6.


Figure 4. Creep curves of Teflon at 70oC

Figure 5. Creep curves of Teflon at 90oC

Figure 6. Creep curves of Teflon at 110oC

]

 

Discussion

 

These creep curves show excellent agreement with experimentally determined data using stress relaxation tests (SRT), [10]. The effect of temperature on the creep curves for Polytetrafluoroethylene can also be deduced from figures 4, 5 and 6 which also is in agreement with the typical creep curve of strain versus time. The slope of the curve is the creep rate.

Fig. 7 shows the effect of temperature on the creep curves of Teflon at a constant stress of 1.95MPa, from the figure, taking data range between time t = 2hrs and 3hrs for strain at 70oC, 90oC and 110oC, the slope of the curve which is the creep rate are 0.144388, 0.117846 and 0.099359, and the rupture-time are 0.49, 0.53 and 0.60 respectively. It is observed that as the temperature increases the steady-state creep rate decreases and the rupture time increases.


 

Figure 7. Effect of temperature on the creep curves for Teflon at constant load of 1.95MPa

 

 

 

Conclusions

 

Creep tests were carried out on Polytetrafluoroethylene (Teflon) test-piece; results obtained were in agreement with what is obtainable in practice. The testing machine now provides additional testing facilities for engineering students to carry out creep test on thermoplastic materials, aluminum and lead in the department of mechanical engineering laboratory.

The creep testing machine developed in this work has proven to be satisfactory, cost effective and good alternative to imported creep testing machine.

 

 

Acknowledgements

 

I would like to say thanks first of all to my advisor Engr. O. N. A. Ajueyitsi the many opportunities he has given me throughout this process to learn and apply different methods to various material testing problems. I would also like to thank all the members of staff, Mechanical Engineering Department, Federal Polytechnic, Ado-Ekiti for always giving me an extra hand when I needed it. Finally I would like to give thanks to all of my friends and family for helping me and always being there for me.

 

 

References

 

1.            Momoh J.J, Ajueyitsi O.N.A., Onipede A.I.M, Development of a Low Cost Mechanically Operated Tensile and Creep Testing Machine, Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 2008, 3(6), p. 491-495.

2.            Trantina G.G., Ysseldyke D.A., An Engineering Design System for Thermoplastics, Proceedings of Society of Plastics Engineers, Technical Conference, 1989, p. 635-639.

3.            Evans H.E., Mechanisms of Creep Fracture, Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, New York, 1984.

4.            Shen Y., The Rate of Creep Deformation, A dissertation submitted for the Degree of Master of Philosophy, Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy, St Edmund’s College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, 2003.

5.            Benham P.P, Crawford R.J., Armstrong C.G., Mechanics of Engineering Materials, 2ed, Longman Group, Singapore. 1996.

6.            Xia Z., Ellyin F., An Experimental Study on the Effect of Prior Plastic Straining on Creep Behavior of 304 Stainless Steel, Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, 1993, 1(15), p. 200-203.

7.            Evans R.W., Wilshire, Introduction to Creep, The Institute of Materials, London. 1993.

8.            Gedney R., Tensile Testing Basics, Tips and Trends Quality Test & Inspection ADMET Inc Norwood., MA. 2005.

9.            ***ASTM International Handbook, Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, United State. 2004.

10.        Woodford D.A., Test Methods for Development, Design and Life Assessment of High Temperature Materials, Journal of Materials and Design, 1993, 14(5), p. 279-284.